Hello,
Sign up to join our community!
Sign up to join our community!
Please sign in to your account!
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Why was Pavel Durov, Telegram's CEO, arrested & what does it say about online freedom vs. platform responsibility?
Dude, this is wild! For example- Durov's chilling, celebrating his kid's birthday, and BAM! Cops swoop in. Talk about a party foul! Seriously, though, it's a huge debate. It's like, if someone uses a hammer to break into a house, do you arrest the hammer maker? Probably not. But what if the hammerRead more
Dude, this is wild! For example- Durov’s chilling, celebrating his kid’s birthday, and BAM! Cops swoop in. Talk about a party foul! Seriously, though, it’s a huge debate. It’s like, if someone uses a hammer to break into a house, do you arrest the hammer maker? Probably not. But what if the hammer maker knew their hammers were only being used for burglaries, and they kept making them anyway? Then maybe they share some blame. Look, Telegram’s got a rep for being like the Wild West of the internet. It’s great for free expression, but also a haven for some seriously messed-up stuff. So, is arresting Durov the answer? shrugs I dunno, but maybe it’ll make him actually, y’know, do something about the bad guys on his platform. Or it will just increase his ego and do nothing! Only time can tell.
See lessWill Trump's potential tariffs on Taiwanese chips actually hurt MediaTek, and how are they preparing for it?
Trump's tariffs are like a surprise pop quiz, and MediaTek's hoping their "manageable" answer gets them a passing grade. But "manageable" could mean anything from "we'll just raise prices a little" to "time to start selling company assets!" They better have a really good calculator for those simulatRead more
Trump’s tariffs are like a surprise pop quiz, and MediaTek’s hoping their “manageable” answer gets them a passing grade. But “manageable” could mean anything from “we’ll just raise prices a little” to “time to start selling company assets!” They better have a really good calculator for those simulations, because Trump’s trade policies are about as predictable as a cat chasing a laser pointer.
And DeepSeek AI? That’s like a budget airline crashing the luxury private jet party. Suddenly, everyone’s wondering if they overpaid for the champagne and caviar. If DeepSeek can seriously deliver on cheap AI, it could force everyone else to get a lot more efficient. MediaTek’s spin on it (“democratizing AI!”) is hilarious. They are trying to sound positive, even if in real its not.
See lessWill cheaper AI really change Big Tech's plans for massive AI infrastructure spending, or will demand just keep growing?
The drop in that chip maker's stock price definitely highlights the short-term market jitters, but it's important to look at the bigger picture. While DeepSeek's innovation could lead to some price adjustments and increased competition among AI infrastructure providers, it's unlikely to derail the oRead more
The drop in that chip maker’s stock price definitely highlights the short-term market jitters, but it’s important to look at the bigger picture.
While DeepSeek’s innovation could lead to some price adjustments and increased competition among AI infrastructure providers, it’s unlikely to derail the overall trend of massive investment. The long-term hardware requirements for AI are simply too significant.
We are moving into an era of more widespread AI adoption. Consider a law firm. What starts as a small experiment can grow into a core part of their operations, creating new demands for AI infrastructure.
So, I would say that this is going to have a positive impact on the growth of the overall sector.
See lessWill cheaper AI really change Big Tech's plans for massive AI infrastructure spending, or will demand just keep growing?
It's tempting to think that cheaper AI means less spending overall, right? But it's worth considering that this DeepSeek thing is more like a catalyst. Think of it like this: if gas suddenly became half the price, would people drive less or more? Probably more! The 'Jevons paradox' is key here – theRead more
It’s tempting to think that cheaper AI means less spending overall, right? But it’s worth considering that this DeepSeek thing is more like a catalyst. Think of it like this: if gas suddenly became half the price, would people drive less or more? Probably more!
The ‘Jevons paradox’ is key here – the idea that making something more efficient doesn’t always mean less consumption; sometimes it means the opposite! Look at a law firm for example: they might start small with AI, but as it becomes more integrated and useful, they end up using it way more.
So, no, I don’t think Big Tech is hitting the brakes on AI infrastructure. They might adjust their strategies a bit, but the overall trend is still upward. Expect more AI, everywhere, even if individual models become more efficient.
See lessMeta & UNESCO are collecting language data for AI. Is this really about helping underserved languages, or is there more to it?
😄
😄
See lessMeta & UNESCO are collecting language data for AI. Is this really about helping underserved languages, or is there more to it?
Okay, so Meta's teaming up with UNESCO... Sounds like a buddy cop movie, right? "Meta, the tech giant with a checkered past, and UNESCO, the squeaky-clean international organization, join forces to save the world... one language at a time!" Cue dramatic music. Honestly, it's like when your friend whRead more
Okay, so Meta’s teaming up with UNESCO… Sounds like a buddy cop movie, right? “Meta, the tech giant with a checkered past, and UNESCO, the squeaky-clean international organization, join forces to save the world… one language at a time!”
Cue dramatic music.
Honestly, it’s like when your friend who always borrows money and never pays you back suddenly offers to treat you to dinner. You’re like, “Uh… what’s the catch?”
Meta’s basically saying, “Hey, we wanna help all those poor, forgotten languages! We’re gonna give them the gift of AI!” And we’re all supposed to be like, “Awww, how generous!”
But let’s be real, Meta’s got ulterior motives shinier than a freshly polished Zuckbot. They need this language data like I need a decent Wi-Fi connection during a Zoom meeting (desperately!).
Think about it: their AI assistant probably struggles to understand anything beyond basic English commands. Imagine trying to ask Meta AI, “Hey, order me some poutine in fluent Quebecois!” It’d probably just stare blankly and suggest you Google “Canadian snacks.”
And those content moderation issues? Don’t even get me started. Their algorithms probably think every Arabic sentence is a declaration of war and every Italian meme is a subtle endorsement of gelato-based terrorism.
So yeah, Meta’s “philanthropy” is probably 50% genuine desire to do good, 40% desperate attempt to fix their PR nightmare, and 10% hoping to finally understand what my grandma’s been saying on Facebook all these years.
It’s like they’re trying to build a Tower of Babel, but this time, they’re hoping AI can actually translate all the different languages instead of causing mass confusion and societal collapse.
Will it work? Maybe. Will Meta suddenly become a beacon of linguistic inclusivity and cultural sensitivity? Probably not.
But hey, at least we might finally get an AI that can understand our sarcastic tweets in all the languages! That’s something, right? Now, if you excuse me, I’m going to go practice my Klingon pickup lines… just in case. Qapla’!
See lessWill AI revolutionize breast cancer screening & ease radiologist workload in the UK? What are the safety & efficacy concerns?
But hold on, Jhon. It's not just about speed. It's about accuracy and safety too. Claire Rowney from Breast Cancer Now makes a really important point. Any changes to the screening program have to be backed by solid evidence that it's safe and effective for women. We can't just rush into this withoutRead more
But hold on, Jhon. It’s not just about speed. It’s about accuracy and safety too. Claire Rowney from Breast Cancer Now makes a really important point. Any changes to the screening program have to be backed by solid evidence that it’s safe and effective for women. We can’t just rush into this without being absolutely sure. The article mentions it’s a “rigorous study” and results will “take time,” which is reassuring. They’re not just blindly implementing AI; they’re testing it thoroughly.
See lessWhy are people interested in seeing underground lines, like the London Underground, added to games? Seems repetitive to me… 🤔
I agree with Samuel here. Beyond the familiarity, think about the immersion factor. You're not just driving a train, you're stepping into the shoes of a real London Underground driver. You're dealing with the specific challenges of that environment, the tight tunnels, the precise signaling, the consRead more
I agree with Samuel here. Beyond the familiarity, think about the immersion factor. You’re not just driving a train, you’re stepping into the shoes of a real London Underground driver. You’re dealing with the specific challenges of that environment, the tight tunnels, the precise signaling, the constant stream of passengers.
Cheapness: The price of this line would likely be low due to reusing the same props.
Timetables are so easy to do: The timetables for underground trains are very well documented.
And as someone mentioned, it might open the door to other metro systems around the world! Imagine recreating the Paris Metro or the New York Subway. The possibilities are endless! Just because you might not personally enjoy it doesn’t mean there isn’t a huge audience out there who would. If the developers can find a price point that makes it attractive, I think it could be a real hit.
See lessDo you think $5.6 million was spent on DeepSeek AI?
It's definitely a point of contention in the tech world right now. While DeepSeek is touting that low $5.6 million training cost, it seems like it might not be the whole story. Some news website publish article and mentions that a research firm called SemiAnalysis estimates DeepSeek actually spentRead more
It’s definitely a point of contention in the tech world right now. While DeepSeek is touting that low $5.6 million training cost, it seems like it might not be the whole story. Some news website publish article and mentions that a research firm called SemiAnalysis estimates DeepSeek actually spent around $1.6 billion on hardware. That’s a HUGE difference!
See lessIt’s possible that the $5.6 million figure only refers to a specific part of the training process, or maybe DeepSeek has a different way of calculating those costs. But honestly, the fact that there’s such a massive discrepancy raises some serious doubts about whether their claims are entirely accurate. So, while it’s possible they found some super-efficient method, it seems more likely that there’s more to the story than what they’re letting on.