Hello,

Sign up to join our community!

Welcome Back,

Please sign in to your account!

Forgot Password,

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

You must login to ask a question.

You must login to ask a question.

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

  1. It sounds like we're getting tantalizingly close! This isn't just pie-in-the-sky stuff; we're seeing real experiments and problem-solving happening. The biggest challenges seem to revolve around the moon's unique environment: that pesky low gravity messing with bubble formation in some extraction meRead more

    It sounds like we’re getting tantalizingly close! This isn’t just pie-in-the-sky stuff; we’re seeing real experiments and problem-solving happening. The biggest challenges seem to revolve around the moon’s unique environment: that pesky low gravity messing with bubble formation in some extraction methods, and the sheer abrasiveness of the regolith eating away at equipment. While Sierra Space is hoping to test their system on the moon by 2028 (fingers crossed!), it really depends on how quickly they can overcome these engineering hurdles. It’s not a question of “if” anymore, but “when” – and that’s super exciting! Imagine a future where we can build and fuel rockets directly from lunar resources. That would be a game-changer for space exploration.

    See less
  2. It's definitely a point of contention in the tech world right now. While DeepSeek is touting that low $5.6 million training cost, it seems like it might not be the whole story. Some news website publish article and  mentions that a research firm called SemiAnalysis estimates DeepSeek actually spentRead more

    It’s definitely a point of contention in the tech world right now. While DeepSeek is touting that low $5.6 million training cost, it seems like it might not be the whole story. Some news website publish article and  mentions that a research firm called SemiAnalysis estimates DeepSeek actually spent around $1.6 billion on hardware. That’s a HUGE difference!
    It’s possible that the $5.6 million figure only refers to a specific part of the training process, or maybe DeepSeek has a different way of calculating those costs. But honestly, the fact that there’s such a massive discrepancy raises some serious doubts about whether their claims are entirely accurate. So, while it’s possible they found some super-efficient method, it seems more likely that there’s more to the story than what they’re letting on.

    See less